Evidence That Files Itself Against the Case
This connector is not prebuilt. It would be built to your requirement on the REST API and ingestion path the platform already uses for records systems, with scope and effort agreed per engagement. Mark43 is a cloud-native RMS and CAD suite adopted by agencies replacing older on-premises systems, which means the agencies running it have usually just been through a migration and have little appetite for another parallel filing system.
How it connects
Case and incident records would come across from Mark43 over its API, and the case number would arrive as a custom attribute on the media, so evidence is retrievable against the case it belongs to rather than against a folder. Attribute mapping carries that identifier across the boundary and keeps it on the item through export and transfer.
Because Mark43 carries both records and dispatch, one connection can answer both questions an agency asks of its evidence: which case an item belongs to, and which call it came from. An engagement would decide whether to pull both or one, since matching by incident needs time and unit correlation on ingest while matching by case needs only the case reference, and the second is considerably less work than the first.
Mark43 would stay the authoritative record, and nothing about how officers write reports changes. A workflow could read the record to assemble a case file, or to find items a report cites that are not present. Being cloud-native, the connection is a network path to a hosted API rather than an integration against an on-premises server, which usually makes it the simpler end of this category to scope.
What you can do together
- File evidence against the Mark43 case number on ingest, so nothing depends on someone choosing the right place.
- Correlate a recording to the call it came from as well as the case it belongs to, where both are in scope.
- Assemble what a case file needs with a workflow reading the record.
- Find cited items that are missing before a deadline finds them.
A scenario
- ScopingThe engagement would agree whether case, incident or both come across, and how each maps to an attribute.
- SetupThe connection would be configured once against the Mark43 API.
- FilingRecordings ingest and attach to their case, under the library's access control, retention and custody record.
- Preparing a fileA workflow reads the case, gathers the attached media, and lists what the report cites but the library does not hold.
- HandoverThe file goes out with the case number on every item, so nothing is re-identified at the other end.
What stays where
Mark43 remains the authoritative record
Cases, incidents and reports stay there, and report writing does not change.
The case number travels with the evidence
It arrives as an attribute under the custody model and survives export and transfer.
Case and incident matching are different work
Matching by case needs a reference; matching by call needs time and unit correlation. Which are in scope is agreed rather than assumed.
Processing runs where you deploy the platform
Shared or dedicated SaaS, your own cloud, on premises, or air-gapped, with a network path to the Mark43 API.
Products and solutions
Next step
See it on your own Mark43 instance. We will show the connection made, the data moving and the output, then size it for your deployment.
Request a demonstration or write to sales@vidizmo.ai
sales@vidizmo.ai · vidizmo.ai/integrations/catalog/mark43