Advice calls reviewed for what was actually said
Recorded calls are transcribed and searchable, so compliance reviews the language used across every call rather than sampling audio by hand.
Integrations
Connect the systems you already run
Whatever you already run, VIDIZMO connects to it: through open standards, a documented API, or an integration you draw yourself on a no-code canvas.
BY SECTOR
What teams build with it
An integration is an app: enabled per portal and configured in settings, so adding one is a configuration change rather than a deployment. Here is what people connect it for.
Disputed transactions matched to branch footage
Pull the clip tied to a time and a place without a manual export from the security system.
Identity documents checked before an account opens
Submitted documents are examined for tampering and filed against the customer record.
Policy answers staff can cite
Questions answered from your own product and compliance material, with the source attached to the answer.
First notice of loss arrives with the photos and video
Claimant media is ingested and attached to the claim as it comes in, rather than sitting in an inbox.
Adjusters review evidence inside the claims system
The player embeds where they already work, and the access rules travel with it.
Faces, plates and personal data removed before a file is shared
Subrogation and third-party sharing without exposing policyholder information.
Patterns across claims surfaced for investigators
Search and analysis across evidence at volume, instead of one case at a time.
Lectures land in the course, not a separate portal
Delivered through the LMS with deep linking and grade passback, so students never leave the course.
Every course video captioned
Transcription and translation against Section 508, ADA and state accessibility obligations.
Interactive video that reports back
Quizzes and annotations inside the lecture, with results returned to the gradebook.
Campus cameras watched on the system already installed
Analytics run against existing cameras rather than a parallel deployment.
Multi-format discovery reviewed in one place
Video, audio and documents processed and searchable together, as litigation increasingly involves all three.
Privileged material redacted before production
With a defensible record of what changed, when and by whom.
Depositions cited by the words spoken
Transcripts linked to the exact moment in the recording.
Cross-border matters handled to local privacy law
GDPR and CCPA obligations met before evidence moves between jurisdictions.
Evidence presented in the courtroom from the case file
No handoff on physical drives and no separate viewer to install.
Hearing recordings published to the public
Redacted to policy, with the release recorded.
Chain of custody intact across the case lifecycle
Every access, change and export written to an audit record.
Body-worn and in-car video filed against the right case
Footage arrives against the case automatically instead of being exported and re-uploaded.
Public records requests met inside statutory deadlines
Redaction at the volume a 45-day release window actually demands.
Existing cameras become an evidence source
Open protocols, so no new hardware and no camera vendor lock-in.
Evidence shared with prosecutors without a physical handoff
Transferred with its metadata and its audit trail intact.
Personal health information removed before video is reused
De-identification before material is used for research, training or publication.
Medical imaging de-identified at scale
DICOM files stripped of identifiers for multi-site studies.
Telehealth recordings kept under the same rules as the record
Retention and access governed alongside the rest of the patient file.
Public meetings streamed, captioned and archived
The record is published as the meeting happens, not weeks later.
Records requests answered with redaction and an audit trail
What was withheld, and why, is recorded alongside what was released.
Archives preserved to the retention schedule
Material ages out on policy rather than by hand.
Low-code and no-code
An integration is a graph you draw
AI Intelligence Hub carries a visual workflow designer. It is how an integration gets built without an engineering ticket, and it is the fastest route to connecting a system that is not in our catalog.
Draw the integration, don't code it
Nodes are placed on a visual canvas, wired together and configured. The HTTP request node reaches any endpoint you describe; the MCP node reaches any Model Context Protocol server. Either becomes a step in the workflow with no code written.
65 nodes across 12 categories
AI, annotation, control flow, data, embedding, human-in-the-loop, integration, output, processing, triggers, tools and platform actions. An integration sits alongside the model call, the branch and the approval step rather than living in a separate system.
A process, not a single call
Workflows carry variables, branching and loops, so an integration can fetch, decide, retry and route. Add a human-in-the-loop node and a person approves before anything is written back to the system you connected.
IN AND OUT
What a graph calls, and what calls a graph
The canvas reaches out over plain HTTP and is reachable the same way, which is why a system we have not named by brand is usually still connectable, and why a graph can be a service another system calls rather than something a person starts.
REST API, outbound
The HTTP request node calls any endpoint, with the method, headers, query parameters and body you specify, and a configurable timeout.
REST API, inbound
An external system invokes a workflow over HTTP and polls for status and result.
Webhooks, outbound
The platform calls your endpoint on media actions, metadata changes, live sessions and workflow completion, subscribable individually or by category.
Webhooks, inbound
The HTTP trigger node maps request body, query string and headers into workflow state, so another system’s webhook starts the graph.
Triggered by a VIDIZMO event
A workflow runs automatically when content is published, so processing starts as material arrives.
MCP
Reaches any system publishing a Model Context Protocol server, over Streamable HTTP, Server-Sent Events or WebSocket. Tool lists are fetched live at bind.
Before procurement asks
What a security reviewer usually wants to know
Does an integration become a way around access control?
No. A live query against a connected system runs as the person asking, so that system’s own rules decide what comes back. Ingested content carries the permissions it arrived with.
What works when the deployment is disconnected?
Outbound paths do: the REST API, ingestion and export, telemetry to a collector inside your own boundary, and self-hosted models that make no external calls.
Anything relying on an inbound call from a vendor’s cloud needs a reachable endpoint, so plan an air-gapped deployment around that.
Which identity does an outbound call run as?
Whichever the job needs. It can authenticate as itself, with an application id and secret owned by the integration rather than a person, so it survives staff changes and is revoked on its own.
Or it can act for the person asking, and the connected system decides what they see.
Where to go next
Find it, or ask for it
Integrations catalog
See what already connects
Every system we connect to, what you can do with each, which VIDIZMO product it works with, and whether it ships today or is built on request.
Browse the catalog →Request an integration
Ask for one that is not listed
Tell us the system and what it should do. We build, test and maintain the connector, and there is no development cost to you.
Make a request →