Discovery From Five Agencies, One Deadline
This connector is not prebuilt. It would be built to your requirement on the REST API path the platform already uses, with scope and effort agreed per engagement. PROSECUTORbyKarpel is the case management system prosecuting attorneys' offices run cases on, from intake through disposition. A prosecutor's problem is not storage: it is that evidence arrives from several agencies in inconsistent formats, against a disclosure deadline nobody can move.
How it connects
Discovery would move with the case number and party metadata attached, so material is filed against the case rather than against whichever agency sent it. Those identifiers travelling is what keeps a package assemblable at all when the same matter has contributions from a city police department, a sheriff's office and a state lab.
A workflow could then do three things that are otherwise manual. Assemble a discovery package from what is attached to the case. Check it against what has already been disclosed, which is the error that produces a sanctions motion. And flag material that still needs redaction before it goes out, which is the other one.
An engagement would settle how a disclosure is recorded as having happened, because the check against prior disclosure is only as good as that record, and offices differ in whether it lives in Karpel, in a spreadsheet, or in someone's memory. Karpel stays the case system of record, and nothing is written back unless a step is scoped for it.
What you can do together
- File discovery against the case number and parties, whichever agency it arrived from.
- Assemble a discovery package from the case record rather than from a list someone maintains.
- Check a package against what has already been disclosed, before a deadline or a motion finds the gap.
- Flag material still needing redaction before it leaves the office.
A scenario
- ScopingThe engagement would agree how case and party metadata map across, and where prior disclosure is recorded.
- SetupThe connection is configured once against the Karpel API.
- IntakeMaterial from each agency files against the case with its identifiers attached, under the library's access control and custody record.
- AssemblyA workflow builds the discovery package, compares it against prior disclosure, and flags two clips still needing redaction.
- DisclosureThe package goes out complete, and the record shows what was disclosed and when.
What stays where
Karpel remains the case system of record
Intake, charging and disposition stay there.
Case and party identifiers travel with the material
That is what makes a package assemblable across several contributing agencies.
The prior-disclosure record is the weak point
The check is only as good as where that record lives, so the engagement settles it.
Processing runs where you deploy the platform
Shared or dedicated SaaS, your own cloud, on premises, or air-gapped.
Products and solutions
Next step
See it on your own Karpel PROSECUTORbyKarpel instance. We will show the connection made, the data moving and the output, then size it for your deployment.
Request a demonstration or write to sales@vidizmo.ai
sales@vidizmo.ai · vidizmo.ai/integrations/catalog/karpel-prosecutorbykarpel